Legal Opinion

Bruner v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 1949No. 34322Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

This proceeding was commenced by Ruby A. Bruner and William B. Bruner to obtain an injunction against the city of Tulsa in a proceeding by that city to annex the town of Dawson, Oklahoma. The matter was first called on application for a temporary injunction to determine whether the temporary injunction should be granted, but issues having been joined by all of the parties, the trial court proceeded to hear evidence and determine the issues on July 6, 1949, and thereafter sustained a demurrer to the evidence and entered its order and judgment denying the temporary injunction and determining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sac & Fox Oil Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Kalka v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Frates Co. of Tulsa v. PlanckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API