Legal Opinion
Bertsch v. Beto
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 18, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 65-H-34PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOEL, District Judge.
Edwin Marious Bertsch, petitioner herein, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. Section 2241.
As petitioner had not exhausted State remedies on three allegations of constitutional dimension1 found in his application, his petition was placed in inactive status on the docket of this Court pending his presentation of those issues to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. In its Memorandum and Order of February 3, 1965, 242 F.Supp. 52, this Court suggested that petitioner utilize the procedure provided by Article 119, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and if…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Procella v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Bertsch v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966