Legal Opinion
Procella v. Beto
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 13, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 70-H-39PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NOEL, District Judge.
Petitioner, represented by retained counsel, has filed a petition for the writ of habeas corpus contending that his state conviction for murder with malice should be set aside because he was denied a fair trial. Respondent has answered attaching state records and pleadings, and has moved to dismiss the petition.
This Court has jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent concedes that state remedies are exhausted.
On June 9, 1970, the Court filed a Memorandum and Order in this case summarizing the petitioner’s complaints, requesting the parties to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker v. SwensonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Tobe v. BensingerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972