State Of Washington v. Wallace Robinson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Cox, J.
Wallace Robinson Jr. appeals his judgment and sentence following his conviction of second degree robbery. His Sixth Amendment 1 right to confrontation was not violated by the admission into evidence of a recorded 911 call by a witness to the robbery. And the prosecutor did not commit misconduct by using the word “we” during closing argument to argue to the jury inferences to be drawn from the evidence at trial. We affirm.
¶2 The material facts are largely undisputed. During the early morning hours of October 27, 2013, Hector Aguayo stood near the entrance of Pike Place Market in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Theresa ScanlanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington, V. Wendell Maurice ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Armel M. LumemboCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Bruno MolinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Bruno MolinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.