Legal Opinion

Nash v. Richard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1964No. 64-184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The order quashing the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing appellants’ petition1 is affirmed because it does not appear from the petition that the City Council of the City of Miami Beach *625failed or refused to perform a clear legal duty prior to the filing of the petition. Howell v. State, 54 Fla. 199, 45 So. 453. The petition alleges:

“7. That the majority of the individual Respondents, including Melvin J. Richard as Mayor of the City of Miami Beach, have openly declared that they will not submit the ‘Fair Play Amendments’ to the qualified electors of Miami Beach, Florida.”

An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turk v. RichardSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Beck v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Howell v. State ex rel. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Mott v. ScofieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-DadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Betts v. City of EdgewaterDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
  3. Nash v. RichardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-DadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-DadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API