Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1939No. 28519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action in ejectment and to quiet title.

Plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs in one of two actions consolidated below wherein judgment was rendered for defendant in error in both actions after jury waived. The parties in error will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant, respectively.

In their petition plaintiffs charge that they are the children or grandchildren of one J. A. Gorman, who died seized and possessed of an undivided one-half interest in the lands in question; that the said J. A. Gorman derived his title thereto by inheritance from his daughter, one Louisa Gorman,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Points v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Stevens v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Lyon v. Robert Garrett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Rogers v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Peddicord v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Hamco Oil and Drilling Company v. ErvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Barrington v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Hahn v. National Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API