Legal Opinion

People v. Haynes

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

This is a motion by the defendant to vacate a judgment of permanent injunction entered upon his consent in 1954 pursuant to a Martin Act proceeding (General Business Law, art. 23-A). Defendant predicates his motion for the vacatur upon the grounds that the judgment resulted by reason of mutual mistake of himself and the Attorney-General regarding his status as a “ dealer ’’ and that in any event substantial justice and equity dictate that the judgment be vacated in light of defendant’s good record before and exemplary conduct since the injunction was granted.

I am not persuaded with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. Federated Radio CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Enterprise Window Cleaning Co. v. SlowutaNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People v. DurkinNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. McknightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ScanlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. People v. ScanlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. People v. ScanlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API