Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Crouch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1952No. 4-9653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This appeal necessitates a consideration of §■ 51-409 Ark. Stats., relating to the procedure essential to perfect a lien on a motor vehicle which has passed out of the possession of the repairman.

Appellees, Crouch and Corley, are partners, trading under the firm name of Crouch Equipment Company, and engaged in the motor vehicle repair business in Ft. Smith. On February 18, 1950, L. G. Markle, then the owner of an International Truck, had the appellees perform work on the truck; and the charges for. such labor and parts were $216.70. After delivering the truck to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. KleinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Standard Lumber Co. of Pine Bluff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Brooks v. International Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. L. O. Umsted Auto Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. NerisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Griffin v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Bramco Electric Corp. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. McWater v. EboneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API