Guest v. Dixon
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Rule 165a(3) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a timely motion to reinstate a case that has been dismissed for want of prosecution extends the deadline to perfect appeal. 1 The rule also states: “A motion to reinstate shall set forth the grounds therefor and be verified by the movant or his attorney.” A divided court of appeals held that a motion to reinstate supported only by the affidavit of the movant’s former attorney in the case does not extend the deadline for appeal. 153 S.W.3d 466 (Tex.App. — Amarillo 2004). We disagree.
Petitioner Anita Guest and her husband James…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Briscoe v. Goodmark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Roccaforte v. Jefferson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Tammy Anderson v. Houston Community College System and Johnella R. Bradford, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Young v. Di FerranteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.