Legal Opinion

Guest v. Dixon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2006No. 04-0128PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 165a(3) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a timely motion to reinstate a case that has been dismissed for want of prosecution extends the deadline to perfect appeal. 1 The rule also states: “A motion to reinstate shall set forth the grounds therefor and be verified by the movant or his attorney.” A divided court of appeals held that a motion to reinstate supported only by the affidavit of the movant’s former attorney in the case does not extend the deadline for appeal. 153 S.W.3d 466 (Tex.App. — Amarillo 2004). We disagree.

Petitioner Anita Guest and her husband James…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Briscoe v. Goodmark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Roccaforte v. Jefferson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Tammy Anderson v. Houston Community College System and Johnella R. Bradford, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Young v. Di FerranteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API