Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 1, 1966No. 65-518PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.
Rane Gilbert Espinoza was a passenger in a car which struck and killed a bicyclist. The driver of the car did not stop. The driver was subsequently convicted and sentenced for the violation of section 317.071, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which is the statute requiring the driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in an injury or death to immediately stop such vehicle at scene of the accident.
The defendant Espinoza was informed ■against for a violation of the same statute. It being alleged that Espinoza was “willfully and knowingly aiding, abetting and assisting”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- The People v. NailsIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. DutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Gains v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Stark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.