Legal Opinion
People v. Rallo
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1931No. Docket No. 1178PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
The defendant was convicted of a violation of section 141 of the California Vehicle Act (Stats. 1929, p. 544, sec. 62), consisting of a failure to render aid to a pedestrian who was struck by his automobile and killed. The defendant was jointly charged and tried with one Jack Gallo who was driving the machine at the time of the accident. The machine was owned by the appellant. He sateby the driver’s side at the time of the accident, but claimed to have been asleep. The driver was acquitted while the owner of the machine was convicted.
The appellant contends that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MacPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.