Legal Opinion

Herring v. Poritz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1880PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Cart, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

In this case, the declaration was upon the common counts in assumpsit. Among other pleas by defendants, was that of the Statute of Limitations of five years, to which plaintiff replied, the bringing of a former suit upon the same causes of action within that time, in which he was non-suited, averring that the time limited from bringing such action expired during the pendency of that suit, and that he brought this present suit within one year from such nonsuit. Defendants, by rejoinder, traversed the averment that plaintiff was nonsuited in such former suit; and by further rejoinder, averred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pratt v. HullNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Clark v. City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sachs v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Boyce v. SnowIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mears Slayton Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API