Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Transport Workers Union of America, C.I.O., Transport Workers Union of America v. Honorable Francis L. Van Dusen
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 23, 1960No. 13251_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
A district judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has issued a temporary restraining order which in effect restrains the defendants until May 28th from calling or encouraging a strike or work stoppage and from picketing the premises of the plaintiff. The defendants bring before us for relief from this order two propositions. The first is an appeal from the order; the second asks for a mandamus directed against the district judge issuing the order.
The first point is easily answered. This Court has said no later than April 25th of this year and again…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pennsylvania Motor Truck Association v. Port of Philadelphia Marine Terminal AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rutland Railway Corporation v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. National Marine Engineers Beneficial AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. Cook County College Teachers Union Local 1600Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Price v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.