Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Pfister

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 11, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01051Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MAURICE L. ROBINSON, ) ) Case No. 17 CV 1051 Plaintiff, ) ) Judge Joan B. Gottschall v. ) ) RANDY PFISTER, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 83), former Illinois prisoner Maurice L. Robinson (“Robinson”) brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments; the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq.; and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”),

29 U.S.C. § 794

et seq.,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API