Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 2003No. C8-02-1292Published

1DissentHanson, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the reversal of Smith’s conviction of first-degree murder while committing kidnapping. I read our prior caselaw to recognize these principles, that (1) the legislature has the exclusive authority to define crimes; (2) the legislature has defined the crime of kidnapping broadly, to include confinement or removal that is minimal and that may even be completely incidental to another facilitated offense; (3) the concerns of the court with the potential for prosecutorial abuse, by overcharging kidnapping to obtain undue punishment, cannot be addressed by changing the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. State v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API