Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Duff

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 30, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2018-1746Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) HAROLD R. STANLEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-1746 (TSC) ) JAMES DUFF and SHERYL WALTER, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Twelve pro se Plaintiffs bring this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701, against Defendants James Duff, former Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (“AOUSC”), and Sheryl Walter, an attorney with the AOUSC, seeking injunctive and compensatory relief for Defendants’ alleged violation of Plaintiffs’ right to meaningful access…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API