Legal Opinion

Ford v. Scott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 4, 1985No. 83-907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Troy E. Ford, from a judgment for the defendant, Charles R. Scott, in plaintiff’s action for breach of contract. The evidence was presented ore tenus. We affirm.

Scott was the owner of all of the stock of the B & S Trenching and Excavating Company, Inc. (B & S). B & S submitted a successful bid on a waterline contract with a third party, but later B & S was unable to obtain bonding on the project. Scott, therefore, sold 76 percent of the B & S stock to John Thornton, and, in return, Thornton made a $150,000 cash bond and agreed to finance the project to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mass Appraisal Services, Inc. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Johnson-Rast & Hays, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Harrelson v. GlissonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Matter of LawlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Thomas Clyce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Clyce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Lavender v. State ex rel. CraigCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API