Legal Opinion
Clyce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 4, 1987No. 87-7561PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) appeals the decisions of the district court denying St. Paul’s motion for directed verdict and granting the Clyces’ motion for a new trial solely on the issue of damages. Civil Action No. 86-G-0530-S (N.D.Ala.). We affirm the decision of the trial judge denying St. Paul’s motion for directed verdict and the jury instructions given on the interpretation of the insurance policy. We reverse the trial judge’s decision granting the Clyces a new trial on the issue of damages.
Background
Appellees in this suit, Thomas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Richard Williams v. The City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Joseph Hewitt v. The B.F. Goodrich Co., a Foreign Corporation and T.G. & Y. Stores, Co., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas Clyce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- HANDLEY v. WERNER ENTERPRISES INCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022