Heidt v. Potamkin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Mr. J. Paul Dawson initiated this suit, alleging that appellee-defendant had violated the Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), OCGA § 10-1-390 et seq. The case was tried before a jury and, at the close of Mr. Dawson’s evidence, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. As the result of Mr. Dawson’s death subsequent to filing this appeal, his executrix has been substituted as the party appellant.
The alleged FBPA violation at issue is an oral misrepresentation occurring in connection with Mr. Dawson’s purchase of a new automobile from appellee. However, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Attaway v. Tom's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Colonial Lincoln-Mercury Sales, Inc. v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Paces Ferry Dodge, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Marett Properties, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Castellana v. Conyers Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Rivergate Corp. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Credithrift of America, Inc. v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Baranco, Inc. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.