Legal Opinion
Warner Co. v. Solberg
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 2001No. 20000327PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Warner and Company (“Warner”) appealed the summary judgment dismissing its breach of contract claim against Shirley Solberg. The trial court held the contract was an unlawful restraint of trade in violation of N.D.C.C. § 9-08-06. We hold a portion of the contract does violate N.D.C.C. § 9-08-06 and there are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment with respect to the remaining portions of the contract. We affirm the judgment in part, reverse the judgment in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Warner is an independent insurance…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- American Welding & Engineering Co. v. LuebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Bosley Medical Group v. AbramsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CDI Energy Services, Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. LynneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Carlson v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.