Legal Opinion
United States v. Dorlouis
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1997No. 96-4329 to 96-4333PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge HARVEY wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge WILLIAMS joined.
OPINION
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge:
The five appellants bringing this appeal were convicted by a jury of conspiring to distribute crack cocaine and of related offenses. They here challenge their convictions on numerous grounds. Additionally, appellant Najac Paul appeals the sentence he received. Because we conclude that all five appellants were properly arrested, charged and convicted and that their other assignments of error are without merit, we affirm…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lisa Amaechi v. Matthew West, and Bernard R. Pfluger Town of DumfriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RhynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Keith Andre McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.