Hill v. Rolfsema

These two causes, involving the right to possession of two motor trucks, arise out of one transaction and accordingly have been consolidated for trial, both in the court-below and in this court.

Appellants alleged that they are the owners of the trucks,subject only to chattel mortgages in favor of appellee, Rolfsema,’ who took possession of the trucks, is now holding them, and refused to surrender them to appellants. Appellants further alleged that appellees’ mortgages contemplated a usurious rate of interest, that appellants have tendered -the balance due appellee, Rolfsema, at a lawful rate…