State ex rel. Norwood v. Kansas City & Memphis Railway & Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Crittenden Chancery Court; Charles T. Coleman, Special Chancellor;
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
This action was instituted by the State of Arkansas, on the relation of the Attorney General, in the chancery court of Crittenden County against the Kansas City & Memphis Railway & Bridge Company, a domestic corporation, to collect hack taxes' on its railroad and bridge property alleged not to have been adequately assessed for the years 1893 to 1910,' inclusive.
The defendant was, according to the allegations of the complaint, incorporated under the laws of the State of Arkansas as a railroad corporation with power to build a railroad from a point in Crittenden County, Arkansas, to the eastern…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. WorthenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Adams v. LuceMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PitcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- State ex rel. Moose v. Kansas City & Memphis Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Iowa State Dept. of Health v. HertkoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- White River Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Bonner v. District Court of First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.