Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Plumb

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 5, 2009No. 08-1413PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged the respondent, Van Plumb, violated several ethical rules by divulging a client’s secrets or confidences, neglecting clients’ cases, attempting to persuade a client to withdraw an ethical complaint, failing to respond to a complaint filed by the board, failing to provide responses to the board’s discovery requests, failing to provide clients with an accounting for unearned retainers, failing to deposit unearned fees in a trust account, engaging in dishonesty or misrepresentation in attempting to cover up his failure to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MarksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James William McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API