State v. Rayford

STEWART, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from judgment entered upon conviction by a jury of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and of stealing.

We affirm.

In general terms the contentions of defendant are that the trial court erred in (1) failing to sustain his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) denying his motion to suppress, (3) admitting evidence with respect to tread patterns on his shoes, (4) failing to suppress evidence of a statement made by defendant and his codefendant, (5) admitting irrelevant testimony of a police officer, and (6) admitting conclusory testimony of a…