Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank, Douglasville v. Wix

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1980No. 59135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Judge.

Plaintiff-bank brought this action to recover upon a promissory note executed by defendant. Plaintiff-appellant subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, submitting that there were no genuine issues of material fact in regard to the bank’s right of recovery.

The trial court denied plaintiffs motion on the grounds that issues of fact remained on defendant’s defense of fraud. From that denial, plaintiff brings this interlocutory appeal. We reverse.

Since the defendant admitted executing the note in question (and not making any payments on the note), and since the note, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freezamatic Corp. v. Brigadier Industries Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Tyson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1809
  3. Wilcox v. City of ElbertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Beazley v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Massey v. Electrical Wholesalers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Speir v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Jay Gleason Advertising Service, Inc. v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Motz v. Landmark First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Abruzzino v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Stephens v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API