Freezamatic Corp. v. Brigadier Industries Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Presiding Judge.
This is an action on two promissory notes against the maker and the endorsers. The defendant’s answer admitted execution of the notes but denied the indebtedness because the notes were "part of a series of actions dealing with stock of the two companies, stock options and other matters.”
Such a pleading is not a defense to this action. Code Ann. § 109A-3 — 307 (2) clearly states, "When signatures are admitted or established, production of the instrument entitles a holder to recover on it unless the defendant establishes a *768defense.” Code Ann. §81A-108 (c) states that "In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kramer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Crosby v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
3Cited by27 opinions
- Charter Medical Management Co. v. Ware Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Johnson v. HeiflerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Mercantile National Bank v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Beazley v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Brooks v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.