Legal Opinion

Rijo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 2, 1986No. 07-86-0167-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Upon his plea of guilty before a jury, appellant Carlos Rhadamez Rijo was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, of 200 grams or more but less than 400 grams. Art. 4476-15, §§ 4.02(a), (b)(3)(D), 4.03(a), (c), (d)(2) (Vernon Supp.1986). The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years confinement and a $10,000 fine.

By his single contention, 1 appellant, characterized as partially Spanish and partially Negroid with Negroid features, submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion to discharge the jury, asserting that the prosecutor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Woodkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Allbright v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API