Legal Opinion

Allbright v. Smith

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1928No. 891—4563PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLhddy, J.

The sole ground for the reversal of this cause by the Court of Civil Appeals (279 S. W. 852) was that it appeared from testimony offered on the hearing of a motion for new trial that Joe L. Oarr, one of the jurors, was fc close friend of and biased in favor of W. D. Futch and wife, who were parties to this suit.

The only evidence offered to sustain this ground of the motion for new trial was the testimony of Henry Buck, one of the jurors. The entire testimony given by him is as follows:

“I was one of the jurors that tried this case about two or three weeks ago. I remember Mr. Carr who was on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Sawyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Smith v. AllbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Tellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Bice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Slaughter v. QuallsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Montoya v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Swap Shop v. FortuneTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kolbo v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API