Legal Opinion

Pasfield v. Donovan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1956No. 33719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

As amended by the legislature in 1953, the zoning law authorizes the institution of actions to prevent violations of municipal zoning ordinances by "any owner or tenant of real property in the same contiguous zoning district as the building or structure in question.” And in the event that a permanent injunction is decreed, it authorizes the court in its discretion to allow the plaintiff a reasonable sum for the services of plaintiff’s attorney, and provides that the allowance shall be part of the costs of the proceeding. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1955, chap. 24, par. 73-9.) The constitutionality of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vogel v. PekocIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Evanston v. WazauIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Manowsky v. StephanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. DugganIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Scherzer v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Champaign v. RosemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Launius v. NajmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. City of Chicago v. WestphalenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. 222 East Chestnut Street Corp. v. LaSalle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API