Legal Opinion

Ghuman v. Gronager CA4/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2020No. D076788Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/19/20 Ghuman v. Gronager CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUKHJIT SINGH GHUMAN, D076788 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018- 00055048-CU-FR-CTL) TOMAS GRONAGER et al., Defendants and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API