People v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered February 8, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, suppression denied, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Any inquiry into the propriety of police conduct must weigh the degree of intrusion which it entails against the precipitat*108ing and attending circumstances which created the encounter (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223; People v Powell, 246 AD2d 366, 368, appeal dismissed 92 NY2d 886). The court’s focus must…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RiddickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.