Legal Opinion

Yeargin v. Garr-Wooley Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1964No. 40588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice:

This is an original proceeding brought by petitioner, Lawrence T. Yeargin, hereinafter referred to as claimant, to review an order of the State Industrial Court denying him compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. This is the second time this cause has been before this Court.

*565Claimant alleged that “around the 19th day of April, 1957,” while employed by Garr-Wooley Oil Company, he contracted an occupational disease resulting from inhalation of noxious fumes while mixing drilling mud.

On the former hearing, the trial judge found the issues generally in favor of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Hackley v. Dalles Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Garr-Wooley Oil Company v. YearginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Cranfill v. JG Beard EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Borden Co. v. TrusleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Banking BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Bossert v. Pittsburg Plate Glass CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API