Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 2, 1986No. 84SA530Published

1DissentVollack, Justice

The majority affirmed the district court’s dismissal of one count of felony theft filed against the defendant, holding that the unauthorized taking by a partner of partnership property is not a crime. I respectfully dissent. A partner should not be immune from prosecution for theft because the property he steals belongs to the partnership.

Under the Colorado theft statute, section 18-4-401, “a person commits theft when he knowingly obtains or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization.” § 18-4-401, 8B C.R.S. (1986). Section 2-4-401(8), IB C.R.S. (1980), provides…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. a & P Trucking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. People v. TreatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Grober v. KahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. Gill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Hucal v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API