Legal Opinion
Engdal v. Owl Drug Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1935No. 25692. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained by her in a fall in a store eondncted by the defendant in the city of Seattle. The case was tried to the court and jury, and a verdict returned in plaintiff’s favor. The. defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict.
The main entrance to appellant’s store was from the west, off Third avenue. The floor space was broken by counters, tables and platforms, used for the display of merchandise and forming aisles or passageways for the accommodation of patrons.
The respondent entered the store for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. . GrennellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Albachten v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Johnson v. RambergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Reed v. L. Hammel Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Smith v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- McIntosh v. Linder-Kind Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1964
- Hemmen v. Clark's Restaurant EnterprisesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Medallion Stores, Inc. v. EidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.