Johnston v. Drainage District No. 80
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Court — N. J. Lee, Judge. Appeal from judgment for damages on account of a drainage improvement. The necessary' facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
I. Appellants complain of several rulings of the court in the admission of evidence upon the question of damages; hut, after a careful examination thereof, we are unable to see how, if erroneous, they could have had any prejudicial effect. The objections urged involve the weight and credibility, rather than the admissibility, of evidence.
II. Evidence was received tending to show that the proposed new drainage district included a portion of the right of way of an old district known as Drainage District No. 16, and that the remaining course thereof followed the line of a private ditch,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mittman v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Stuhr v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Taylor v. Drainage District No. 56Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Barton v. BoieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Bird v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hicks v. Franklin County AuditorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Thompson v. City of OsageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Harris v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953