Legal Opinion
Feigley v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (AT & T/Verizon)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
In the two above-captioned separately docketed matters that were consolidated for argument before this Court, Sandra L. Feigley (Feigley) and The Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants (C.U.R.E.),3 collectively Petitioners, petition for review of the April 19, 2001 opinion and order issued by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) at Docket No. C-00981434. Said order denied Feigley’s and C.U.R.E .’s exceptions and adopted, with modification, the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) June 27, 2000 recommended decision, and designated the matter…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Gregorio Lopez v. E.G. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Strandberg v. City of HelenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Feigley v. PA. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'NCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- M. Rokita Jr. v. PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021