Legal Opinion

State v. Walden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1985No. 85-418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state complains that the record is insufficient to support the trial judge’s departure from the sentencing guidelines mitigating the defendant’s sentences. We agree. Therefore, the order appealed is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the sentences previously imposed and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea if he so chooses. See State v. Davis, 464 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In the event the defendant does not choose to withdraw his plea, the trial court shall conduct a further sentencing hearing, after which the trial judge shall enter such sentences as he deems…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Addison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. TwelvesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API