Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 1987No. 4-86-2483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The state appeals, contending the trial court erred in departing below the recommended guidelines sentence, following the defendant’s plea of guilty. The defendant *1210disagrees but further argues that if the trial court erred, he should be able to withdraw his plea of guilty, citing State v. Walden, 476 So.2d 771 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) and Stanley v. State, 501 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

We hold that the trial court erred in departing below the guidelines sentence because its stated reason lacked any eviden-tiary basis in the record. See Tanner v. State, 468 So.2d 505 (Fla.2d DCA 1985); Wyman v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Tanner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Wyman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. WaldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. BeasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API