Legal Opinion

Dixie Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 8, 1948No. 52255; protest 122808-K (Laredo)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This protest involves the proper classification for duty purposes of certain emblems imported from Mexico which were assessed at a compound rate aggregating 110 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (c) (2), Tariff Act of 1930, as “Articles * * * designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including * * * military * * * ornaments * * *.” The importer claims the merchandise to be properly dutiable at 32J4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the tariff act, as modified by the trade agreement with Mexico, T. D.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Gaunt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Meadows Wye & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API