Legal Opinion
In Re Mendoza
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided July 18, 2002No. 13-02-00032-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice HINOJOSA.
Relators, Jose Antonio Mendoza (“Mendoza”) and Hugo Jofre (“Jofre”), have filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which they ask this Court to compel respondent, the Honorable Daniel Sklar, presiding judge of the 329th District Court of Wharton County, to vacate his orders denying relators’ motions to transfer venue and to abate. After receiving a response from the real parties in interest, Central Freight Lines (“Central”) and Jim Kerry Nixon (“Nixon”), and after hearing oral argument, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
A. BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. Yarto International Group, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
- Fincher, P.C. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- In Re Shell Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- in Re J. Michael Fincher, P.C., J. Michael Fincher, Individually, Benjamin Johnson, John M. Martineck, Michael Havard, and Provost Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.