Legal Opinion
Rubenstein v. Lottow
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 3, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This case was considered in 220 Mass. 156, where the facts as they then appeared are stated at length. In accordance with the rescript there ordered, a new trial has been had upon certain issues. The facts now disclosed, new or different from those there set forth and material to the present decision, will be adverted to, so far as necessary. Several questions are presented.
1. Were the book accounts assigned to the defendant the property at that time of Setlin, the bankrupt, or of the firm of Setlin and Smith, of which he was a member? The trial judge,* after a hearing at which the various…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Keppel v. Tiffin Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Palmer Clay Products Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Adams v. ChampionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Edwards v. CockburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.