Legal Opinion

Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, LLC

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided March 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-00251-GHD-SAAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION FILED BY DEFENDANTS NOATEX CORPORATION AND KOHN LAW GROUP, INC

GLEN H. DAVIDSON, Senior District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration [177] filed by Defendants Noatex Corporation and Kohn Law Group, Inc.1 Upon due consideration of all the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that the motion should be denied.

*748 A. Factual and Procedural History

Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. (“APMM”) contracted with Noatex Corporation (“Noatex”) for Noatex to construct an auto parts manufacturing facility in Guntown,…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bracken Construction Company, Inc. v. Liebherr-America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
  2. Intent Performance LLC v. Intent Sports & Fitness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
  3. North American Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API