Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Fernando Quintana-Torres
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2000No. 99-50690PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 15, 2000 [224 F.3d 1157] is amended as follows:
Slip op. p. 1159,1.9, add: “Alternatively, voluntarily remaining in the country after an involuntary entry satisfies the statute.”
Slip op. p. 1159, 1.7, add: “Apprendi argument. Quintana’s argument that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), overruled Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), fails. See United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000).”
With these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Gerardo Parga-RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Chong LamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rigoberto Castellanos-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Lucio Pina-Jaime, AKA Lucio Pina Jaime AKA Lucio Jaime PinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.