Legal Opinion
In re August, 1993 Regular Grand Jury
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 10, 1994No. Misc. No. 93-63; Grand Jury Subpoena No. KMS-41-02PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Entry Regarding United States’ Supplemental Motion to Reconsider Court’s Order Regarding Grand Jury Subpoena
TINDER, District Judge.
This is the second time issues surrounding the grand jury subpoena (No. KMS-41-02) of [the Corporation]1 have been brought before this court. The first excursion was generated by [the Corporation’s] Motion to Quash the subpoena, resulting in an order which denied the motion but modified the subpoena. See In re August, 1993 Grand Jury, 854 F.Supp. 1392, Entry Denying Mot. to Quash, Denying Mot. for Protective Order & Modifying Subpoena, Mise. No. 93-63 (S.D.Ind.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sedrak v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- McConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Plaskon Electronic Materials, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bradley v. WorkDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.