Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The Stanolind Oil and Gas Company has appealed from a judgment rendered against it in favor of C. F. Lambert for the destruction of two of Lambert’s water wells. Trial was to the court without a jury and findings of fact and conclusions of law were requested and filed. The trial judge concluded that the doctrine of res. ipsa loquitur was applicable to the case and based the judgment thereon.
Appellant, among others, presents the contention that the evidence is insufficient to support a recovery under 'the doctrine relied upon and consequently the judgment must be reversed.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Comanche Duke Oil Co. v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Universal Atlas Cement Co. v. OswaldTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Thoreson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. ManzielTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Klostermann v. Houston Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Stafford v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.