Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 1, 1988No. 19970-6-IPublished
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilliams, J.
(concurring in part, dissenting in part)—I concur with the determination that the tip agreement between Henry's Off Broadway and its valets is void and unenforceable, but I dissent from the conclusion that the trial court did not err in allowing Henry's to present evidence of its good faith.
*108Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), any employer who violates the minimum wage provisions of the act shall be liable to the affected employees in the amount of their unpaid wages plus an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. To recover liquidated damages, an employee need not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Distributors, Inc. v. Glenmore Distilleries Company and Foreign Vintages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Williams v. Tri-County Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Richard v. Marriott Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- C.D. Joiner, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Cross-Appellee v. City of MacOn Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- James Olson v. Superior Pontiac-Gmc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.