Baltimore Trust Co. v. Stanton
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : I am of opinion that the motion of the plaintiff for a directed verdict in its favor should have been granted, and, therefore, dissent from the affirmance of the judgment, indicated in the opinion of the Chief Justice, for the reasons which follow.
This is an action upon a negotiable promissory note, ex-acuted by. the defendant on November 7, 1921, for $7,500, payable January 7, 1922, to the Bank of Clio, with 8 per cent, interest after maturity and 10 per cent, attorneys’ fees. The plaintiff claims to have acquired the note from the Bank of Clio as a holder in due course.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Citizens Trust & Savings Bank v. StackhouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Hatch v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.