United States v. McHenry
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
I. THE SENTENCING ISSUE.'
The sentencing of the defendant scheduled for Friday, August 20, 1993, presents the question of whether the mandatory and consecutive sentencing provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (hereafter § 924) apply in addition to the sentences required by reason of the defendant’s convictions for carjacking in violation of recently enacted 18 U.S.C. § 2119 (hereafter § 2119). 1
The defendant was found guilty by a jury on May 26,1993 of three counts of carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119, three counts of the use of a firearm in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Ashfaq MohammedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
- United States v. SabiniDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- United States v. PayneDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- United States v. FordDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.