Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided October 5, 1993No. 5:93-cr-00137PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

Before trial of the above-entitled case, defendants, Norman J. Moore and Rodney Hewlett, challenged the right of the United States of America to charge them in Counts Two and Four of the indictment with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 and in Counts Three and Five with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), by simply adopting and repeating the acts charged in Counts Two and Four as the acts upon which Counts Three and Count Five were based. This challenge was contained in pre-trial motions to dismiss Counts Three and Five. The court found the issue puzzling…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. SingletonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
  3. United States v. McHenryDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Heath A. Singleton and Douglas Joseph AlemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Norman J. Moore Rodney HewlettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. SabiniDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  4. United States v. FordDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  5. United States v. TorresDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API